As scores of protesters outside the Family Justice Center in Minneapolis demanded justice, the four officers sought separate trials in the case, as court filings showed each seeking to pin the blame for Floyd’s death on the others.
Derek Chauvin, charged with second and third-degree murder and manslaughter after being filmed pressing his knee to Floyd’s neck until he died, claims a fentanyl overdose was the cause of the fatality and accused two other officers of not correctly assessing Floyd’s condition.
Read Also: Officers Charged In Floyd’s Killing Get Trial Date In March
Prosecutors rejected the overdose claim as “ludicrous” and said all four — Chauvin, Thomas Lane, Alexander Kueng, and Tou Thao — should be tried together based on “substantial evidence” that they “worked in close concert with one another” when Floyd was killed.
– ‘Brutal and dehumanizing’ murder –
Floyd’s death on May 25 became a symbol of what many say is systemic racism and abuse of African Americans by police, and sparked protests across the country that continue under the banner of “Black Lives Matter.”
Prosecutors say Floyd’s death was “vicious, brutal, and dehumanizing.” He had been detained for allegedly using a counterfeit $20 bill.
All four defendants say the decision to restrain Floyd, who was handcuffed and held down by two of the officers while under Chauvin’s knee — was reasonably justified.
The officers were all fired one day after Floyd’s death, reflecting the growing seriousness with which US cities are beginning to take police abuse allegations.
Lane, Kueng, and Thao face charges of aiding and abetting second-degree murder and manslaughter.
District Court Judge Peter Cahill rejected a defense lawyer’s move to introduce evidence into the trial that during a May 2019 arrest in Texas, Floyd swallowed drugs to avoid being charged.
The defense is suggesting, but has not revealed evidence, that Floyd did the same in the May 25, 2020 incident.
– “Black Lives Matter” –
Protesters gathered outside the courthouse in downtown Minneapolis ahead of the hearing, chanting “George Floyd!” and carrying placards and a large flag that read “Black Lives Matter.”
The hearing focused on the difficulty of providing a safe and fair jury trial, scheduled to begin in March 2021, given the massive publicity to the case, which has inflamed opinions on both the right and left sides of the political spectrum.
As the defendants, their lawyers, and prosecutors all wore safety masks, the court wrestled over how to seat a jury given the threat of Covid-19, and what defense lawyers said are constant threats over the phone and social media that could poison a fair trial.
Jury selection usually involves parading dozens of candidates through a courtroom for live questioning by lawyers from both sides to determine if they are already biased.
Cahill proposed to send questionnaires to potential jurors at their homes.
But defense attorneys said that risks them being able to look up the case on the internet and form opinions before they reply to the questions.
Meanwhile, the judge put off, for the time being, a motion by defense lawyers to move the case to another jurisdiction, saying a fair trial in Minneapolis was impossible.
After hearing, Ben Crump, an attorney for Floyd’s family accused the defendants of falling back on tactics of smearing Floyd’s image to justify his death.
It is “a blatant attempt to kill George Floyd a second time: They kill a person and then assassinate his character,” Crump said.
“The only overdose that killed George Floyd was an overdose of excessive force and racism by the Minneapolis Police Department,” he said.
AFP