A federal appeals court has cleared the way for Florida’s controversial immigration detention center, nicknamed “Alligator Alcatraz,” to remain open, reversing a lower court order that called for its closure.
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta ruled 2-1 in favor of Florida officials and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), allowing the facility to continue operating while legal challenges play out. The majority opinion, written by two Trump-appointed judges, found the site was not subject to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) because it has not received federal funding. A dissenting judge, appointed by former President Obama, disagreed.
Last month, District Judge Kathleen Williams ordered the center dismantled within 60 days, siding with environmental groups and the Miccosukee Tribe, who argued that the complex threatens the fragile Everglades ecosystem and violates tribal ancestral rights. The site, a converted airport within the wetlands, began housing detainees in July.
Read Also: RFK Jr. Stands Firm On Health Shake-Up Amid Ouster Calls
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis welcomed the appeals court’s decision. “Alligator Alcatraz is open for business,” he said, accusing critics of using environmental law to undermine immigration enforcement. DHS echoed that sentiment, calling the ruling “a win for the American people, the rule of law, and common sense.”
But conservationists say the case is far from over. The Center for Biological Diversity described the outcome as “a heartbreaking blow to the Everglades and every living creature there.” Friends of the Everglades said it was reviewing the decision, while the Miccosukee Tribe has yet to comment.
The detention center has become a flashpoint in the broader debate over immigration enforcement and environmental protection. While supporters argue it is essential to public safety and border control, opponents warn it represents both an ecological threat and an overreach of state power.
The appellate ruling allows the facility to keep operating while the lawsuit continues, setting the stage for a prolonged legal battle over the balance between national security priorities and environmental safeguards.