The median Uber and Lyft driver in California cleared $5.97 an hour after expenses — before tips. That number, documented by the UC Berkeley Labor Center, sits at the center of a labor fight that is quietly reshaping how American workers can organize, and it has already produced the first law of its kind in the United States.
Massachusetts voters approved it last November. Fifty-four percent backed a ballot initiative that gives rideshare drivers a path to union membership and collective bargaining that bypasses the federal framework — a framework workers and labor advocates say was never built for the gig economy and has been systematically exploited by the companies that run it.
Since the law took effect, thousands of drivers have signed union cards. The industry has responded by funding legislation designed to slow the process down.
The fight is not staying in Massachusetts.
California’s state House has already passed a comparable bill. It now sits in the Senate with a plausible route to the governor’s desk by October. In Minnesota and Illinois, driver networks are pressing state legislators to introduce their own versions. What began as a single ballot initiative in one northeastern state is developing the early shape of a national movement — one built around a labor strategy that the country largely abandoned decades ago and is now scrambling to recover.
That strategy is sectoral bargaining: the practice of negotiating wages and conditions across an entire industry rather than workplace by workplace, employer by employer.
Under the standard federal model — the National Labor Relations Act, which has governed most private sector organizing since 1935 — workers must organize at a specific worksite, win a majority vote, and then negotiate with a single employer.
Read also: Nvidia Earnings Ease AI Bubble Fears But Markets Stay Cautious
The process is slow, legally complicated, and heavily weighted toward management. Research tracking outcomes under the NLRA found that only one in seven union organizing campaigns results in a first contract within a year of workers voting to unionize. Companies have perfected delay as a strategy, and delay, in an industry where driver turnover is high and workers are scattered across an app rather than a factory floor, is frequently fatal to an organizing effort.
Massachusetts changed the math.
Under the new law, drivers can obtain the contact information of fellow workers once they demonstrate support from just five percent of the workforce — compared to the thirty percent threshold the NLRA requires before similar access is granted. Getting to fellow workers early, before companies can flood the zone with anti-union messaging, is something labor organizers have sought for years. In an industry where the platform itself controls all communication between the company and drivers, that access is not a procedural nicety. It is the difference between a campaign that lives and one that dies before it starts.
Starting formal collective bargaining requires support from twenty-five percent of drivers, not the fifty percent plus one majority demanded under federal law. And crucially, Massachusetts builds in arbitration — meaning that if talks stall, workers can still reach a contract. Under the NLRA, employers can delay negotiations indefinitely, which they routinely do.
Read also: Stellantis, NVIDIA, Uber, Foxconn’s Alliance For Robotaxi Push
When a contract is reached, it covers every rideshare driver in the labor market, regardless of which company they work for. Uber drivers and Lyft drivers bargain together. The agreement applies to all of them.
That structure matters because it removes the incentive for companies to compete by cutting driver pay — if standards are set across the industry, no single firm gains an advantage by racing to the bottom.
The wages that currently exist at the bottom are striking in their severity. Berkeley’s researchers found that drivers in Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Seattle — cities with some of the country’s existing rideshare pay mandates — still earned less than the applicable local minimum wage when total shift time and expenses were factored in. The California figure of $5.97 an hour accounted for the additional taxes independent contractors pay and the costs drivers absorb that employees do not. Tips pushed the median to $7.63. Neither number approaches what most people would describe as a living wage in any major American city.
The companies contest these findings. They have also contest, funded campaigns against, and in some states successfully blocked, every significant legislative effort to raise driver standards.
The Massachusetts law exists because it went directly to voters — and because it was designed around a legal opening the companies themselves created by classifying drivers as independent contractors rather than employees. That classification, intended to limit company obligations, also freed states from federal labor law preemption. Drivers are using that gap.
The experiment is young. The machinery in Massachusetts is still coming online. But the model — sectoral bargaining, lower thresholds, guaranteed arbitration — is one that labor organizers in Australia, the European Union, and Britain are all moving toward simultaneously.
American rideshare drivers got there first.