Manchester United legend Paul Scholes has offered a sharp tactical assessment of Chelsea’s attacking setup, arguing that Cole Palmer and other creative midfielders are being limited by the team’s lack of genuine pace in the forward line.
Speaking on TNT Sports, Scholes emphasized that players like Palmer thrive best when there’s a quick, dynamic striker ahead of them — someone capable of stretching defences and creating space between the lines. He drew comparisons with former Arsenal forward Ian Wright, renowned for his off-the-ball movement and lethal finishing.
“These midfield players as No.10s — like Chelsea’s Cole Palmer — they need pace up front, they need an Ian Wright up there,” Scholes said. “I don’t think Nicolas Jackson is the greatest finisher. You’re never that confident he’s going to score when he’s running through on goal. I didn’t get that impression with him.”
While critical of Jackson’s finishing, Scholes acknowledged the Senegalese striker’s work rate and movement, highlighting that his presence still benefits the team’s structure. “At least he gets you up the pitch and he’s got the movement that helps other players because it gives them space,” he added. “When you’re not playing against pace, everyone is pushed up and there’s nowhere to go.”
Chelsea’s frontline has come under increasing scrutiny this season. Despite flashes of promise, inconsistency in finishing has plagued Enzo Maresca’s side. Jackson, who has scored only a handful of goals in recent Premier League matches, continues to divide opinion among pundits and fans alike.
Scholes’ comments align with a broader concern about Chelsea’s lack of cutting edge. The team has created numerous chances under Maresca’s possession-based system but often failed to convert them — a problem that’s cost them valuable points in close matches.
Read Also: Hundreds Saved After Snow Trap On Everest’s Tibetan Side
Cole Palmer, meanwhile, has been one of Chelsea’s standout performers this season, delivering goals and assists from midfield. Yet, as Scholes noted, his full creative potential may remain untapped until Chelsea pair him with a clinical striker who can complement his vision and timing.
Scholes’ verdict adds to the growing debate over whether Chelsea should seek a new centre-forward in January — someone capable not only of finishing but also of transforming the entire rhythm of their attack.