The world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer wants into Formula One. Figuring out how — at a price that makes financial sense, in a form that actually serves its purposes — is a different calculation entirely.

BYD has been examining options for F1 involvement as the Shenzhen-based automaker intensifies its push into markets where it remains largely unknown. The company declined to comment on its ambitions. But the commercial logic is not difficult to read: Formula One reaches hundreds of millions of viewers globally, and China — where BYD already dominates — is home to 221.1 million F1 fans and hosts its own round of the championship in Shanghai.

With plans to manufacture locally in Europe by 2028, the sport represents a rare opportunity to compress years of international brand-building into a single, globally televised platform. As Bernstein research analyst Ian Moore put it, F1 is simply “the greatest marketing vehicle for OEMs that’s out there.”

Three pathways exist: full constructor entry, a stake in an existing team, or a sponsorship arrangement. None of them is clean.

Read also: Nissan’s Initiative To Lower Electric Car Manufacturing Costs

A full entry is where the numbers become staggering. Any 12th team joining the grid today would likely face anti-dilution fees exceeding $450 million — the threshold Cadillac crossed when General Motors’ luxury brand entered this year. That covers the entry cost alone. Building competitive infrastructure adds another layer: Aston Martin’s factory and wind tunnel campus at Silverstone cost an estimated £150 million to £200 million, and after that investment, the team has managed a single championship point this season. Formula One rewards engineering excellence accumulated across years of iteration, and BYD would arrive as an unknown quantity in a discipline it has never entered. “From a financial point of view it might not sound like a wise move to spend so much money on a field they barely know,” said Felipe Munoz, an independent analyst who runs the Car Industry Analysis platform.

Institutional appetite for a Chinese constructor does exist. FIA President Mohammed Ben Sulayem and Formula One’s commercial leadership have indicated openness to a 12th team from China, contingent on the commercial and sporting justification that would make such an addition viable for the sport as a whole. BYD’s balance sheet could satisfy the FIA’s technical and governance compliance requirements. Whether the company’s board is prepared to authorize nine-figure expenditures in pursuit of a racing program it cannot guarantee will deliver results is a separate question.

Read also: Türkiye’s Electric Car Count Climbs To 290,000 In July

The middle option — acquiring a stake in an existing outfit — offers a lower entry price but comes with structural constraints that limit its appeal. Otro Capital, a minority investor in the Alpine F1 team, is seeking to divest its 24 percent stake. The problem is Renault. The French automaker controls Alpine, retains majority ownership, and holds approval authority over any incoming investor. A BYD purchase of the Otro position would buy a minority share with marginal strategic leverage — hardly the platform for engineering visibility that would justify the acquisition.

Former Red Bull principal Christian Horner, who has been in contact with BYD as he pursues his own return to the sport, may find the Otro stake more useful to his purposes than BYD would to its own.

That leaves sponsorship as the path of least resistance.

A branding arrangement with a midfield or back-of-grid team would carry costs well below Oracle’s reported $300 million, five-year title partnership with Red Bull Racing. Williams’ title deal with software company Atlassian runs between $40 million and $60 million annually — manageable for a company of BYD’s scale and profile. Sponsorship also bypasses FIA regulatory requirements entirely, since the compliance framework governs competitors, not commercial partners. Nick De Marco, a sports law barrister at Blackstone Chambers, called it “the lowest risk” option available.

The problem is what it does not deliver. Bernstein’s Moore raised the possibility that a BYD sponsorship could put it in conflict with established automakers already embedded in the sport — Ferrari, Mercedes-Benz, Ford, and Cadillac among them — who might resist a rival OEM’s branding appearing on a competitor’s car. More fundamentally, De Marco named the limitation that no sponsorship deal can resolve: a logo on someone else’s bodywork offers no demonstration of BYD’s engineering and manufacturing capability. The company’s value proposition, the thing that has driven its ascent against legacy automakers in China and now in Europe, cannot be expressed from the pit lane.

“I imagine,” De Marco said, “that is the key benefit BYD would seek to derive from that participation.”

What BYD wants most from Formula One is precisely what the sport’s cheapest entrance cannot provide. The doors that would provide it open onto costs that analysts are openly skeptical the company will pay.