The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank have resumed formal dealings with Venezuela, marking a significant shift in the country’s relationship with global financial institutions after more than six years of suspension.
The two Washington-based lenders said they would now engage with Venezuela under the administration of interim President Delcy Rodriguez, following a decision by IMF member states to recognise the current authorities as the country’s legitimate representatives.
Ties had been severed in 2019 after a prolonged dispute within the international community over whether to recognise Nicolas Maduro or opposition figure Juan Guaido as Venezuela’s rightful leader following contested elections. The lack of consensus at the time prevented the IMF and World Bank from formally engaging with Caracas.
IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva said the decision to resume dealings was guided by the views of a majority of member countries, allowing the Fund to re-engage in a way that could ultimately benefit the Venezuelan population.
Read also: EU Leaders Press Orban To Drop $103 Billion Ukraine Loan Veto
The World Bank said shortly afterwards that it would follow the IMF’s lead, noting that its decision was based on the outcome of the Fund’s internal process. The bank added that it last extended a loan to Venezuela in 2005, highlighting the long gap in financial cooperation.
The restoration of ties is expected to allow the IMF to begin a full economic assessment of Venezuela for the first time in roughly two decades, a step considered necessary before any formal lending programme can be put in place.
Analysts say such an assessment could eventually unlock access to billions of dollars in funding, including special drawing rights held by Venezuela at the IMF that have remained inaccessible since the breakdown in relations.
The development comes amid broader geopolitical changes involving Venezuela. In recent weeks, the administration of United States President Donald Trump lifted sanctions on Rodríguez, a move widely seen as part of Washington’s effort to support the interim government and restore Venezuela’s access to international financial systems.
Rodríguez, who assumed office earlier this year following the removal of Maduro, welcomed the decision, describing it as a diplomatic breakthrough. In remarks broadcast on state television, she thanked countries that supported Venezuela’s return to the IMF and framed the move as a step toward economic stabilisation.
The renewed engagement clears the way for Caracas to seek financial assistance if needed, at a time when the country faces severe economic challenges. Venezuela is estimated to carry external liabilities exceeding 150 billion dollars, one of the highest debt burdens globally, with large portions of its sovereign debt in default.
Read also: Sassou Nguesso Claims 94.8% As Congo Extends 42-Year Rule
Previous attempts to access IMF funding were blocked due to the leadership dispute. In 2020, the Fund rejected a request from Venezuela for a 5 billion dollar emergency loan to address the COVID-19 crisis, citing the absence of international agreement over who controlled the government.
The IMF has already begun preliminary steps toward re-engagement, including collecting economic data after years of limited access. A full lending programme, however, would depend on further assessments of Venezuela’s fiscal position and debt sustainability.
Investors have reacted cautiously but with interest, with some betting that renewed ties with multilateral institutions could pave the way for debt restructuring and eventual economic recovery.
Venezuela has been a member of both the IMF and the World Bank since 1946, but its relationship with the institutions has been largely dormant in recent years due to political isolation, sanctions, and economic collapse.
The resumption of ties signals a potential turning point, though officials and analysts say the pace and scope of any financial assistance will depend on continued political recognition, economic reforms, and the country’s ability to stabilise its institutions.