Four Republican senators crossed the aisle Tuesday to hand President Donald Trump one of his sharpest congressional rebukes since taking office, advancing a resolution that would force him to end the Iran war unless he seeks authorization from Congress.

The procedural vote passed 50 to 47.

The tally was close, but the symbolism cut deep. For eighty days, Trump has prosecuted a war against Iran — through airstrikes, a naval blockade and open combat in the Strait of Hormuz — without a formal declaration of war from Congress. Tuesday’s vote was the first time a meaningful bloc of his own party moved publicly against him on it.

Senators Rand Paul of Kentucky, Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska voted with Democrats. So did Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, who cast his ballot just days after losing his Republican primary to a Trump-endorsed challenger — a sequence that stripped away any political calculation from his decision. Three other Republicans did not vote. Pennsylvania Democrat John Fetterman was the only member of his party to vote no.

The resolution was sponsored by Democratic Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia, who argued that the timing could not be more opportune. Iran has put a new peace proposal on the table, Kaine said, and rather than bringing it to Congress for debate, Trump has dismissed it outright. He called on the president to make his case to lawmakers before the shooting resumes.

Read also: Pakistan’s Mediator Role Tested As Iran-US Tensions Escalate

That last point — before the shooting resumes — carries weight, because the legal status of the current conflict is disputed at the most basic level.

On May 1, exactly sixty days after Trump formally notified Congress that military operations against Iran had begun, the White House declared that a ceasefire had “terminated” the hostilities. The 1973 War Powers Resolution, passed in the aftermath of Vietnam, gives a president sixty days to wage military action before he must either end it, seek congressional approval or request a thirty-day extension based on operational necessity. By declaring the war over, the administration effectively argued the clock had stopped.

What has happened since suggests otherwise. U.S. forces have continued blockading Iranian ports and striking Iranian vessels. Iran has maintained effective control over the Strait of Hormuz and has kept attacking American ships. The war, by every operational measure, has continued.

Democrats and the small band of Republicans who joined them Tuesday say the constitutional math is straightforward: Congress declares war, not the president. They have pushed that argument eight times in the Senate this year. Seven of those attempts were blocked by the Republican majority before the measure could even be debated. Tuesday’s vote broke that streak.

Read also: Iran Shows Defiance Yet Remains Open To US Negotiations

The path forward remains difficult. Even with Tuesday’s procedural victory, the resolution must clear the full Senate, then survive the Republican-led House, where three similar measures have already been defeated by thin margins. And if it clears both chambers, Trump is expected to veto it — a veto that would require two-thirds majorities in each chamber to override. None of that is likely. But Tuesday’s vote demonstrated that the coalition defending the president’s unchecked war authority has started, however narrowly, to fray.

Republican leaders and the White House maintain Trump acted within his constitutional authority as commander in chief when he ordered military operations against Iran. Some Republicans have gone further, accusing Democrats of filing war-powers resolutions as a political tactic rather than out of genuine constitutional concern.

Kaine has rejected that framing. He pointed to the Republican votes alongside him as evidence the argument transcends party.

The resolution, if enacted, would not end the conflict immediately — it would compel Trump to return to Congress and make a formal case for continuing it. That distinction matters. The debate in Washington has never really been about whether to fight Iran. It has been about who gets to decide.

Cassidy’s vote may have said it most plainly. He had nothing left to protect politically — his primary was already lost, his seat endangered by Trump’s intervention in Louisiana. What he cast Tuesday was a vote on principle, by a senator who no longer had much to lose by having one.